Types Of Verbal Deception
This study serves to attain a better understanding of deception types and the nature of verbal manipulation. In this report analysis of various research was used to come to a consensus on the different types of verbal deception and how they affect apparent message competence and manipulative qualities. Analysis confirms that the Information Manipulation Theory is the best indicator of deception types in Western Discourse. Through careful evaluation, evidence seems to suggest that manipulations of quality, quantity, relation, and manner all significantly influence perceived message competence and deceptiveness. The violation of quality was found to be the most deceptive.Two major avenues of study have risen in deception research. One looks at a persons ability to detect deceptive messages. The other inquires what makes up a deceptive message. While this article touches on both, it focuses on the latter issue. When looking at types of message deceit, this study sought to find what types of messages are involved in manipulation and what types of are perceived as being the most manipulative. Manipulation in communication is defined as messages intended to mislead receiver
This study found extreme inherent interdependence between the maxims. It seems whenever researchers try to categorize deception types they have problems with consistency. The study looked at similarity judgments of forty-six deception-related terms. This study was the first to empirically test the IMT. Quality refers to the assumptions that the information being shared is not false. However, we still have no way to predict what type of IMT violation will occur within a given situation. " These terms describe deceptive criminal acts. This essay will examine different manipulation literature and come to a consensus on what verbal communication manipulation entails. The hypothesis was that people with a strong interdependent self-construal "will be positively associated with honesty ratings for violations of quality, relevance and manner. Relevance becomes a matter of degree. While violations of manner and relevance can seem objective at times, the IMT maintains ability to structure the different types of message deception. It sought to find out what violations were perceived to be most deceptive. Masks refer to words that "describe activities that obscure (mask) another persons view of the truth"(Hopper 297).
Common topics in this essay:
Co-operative Principle,
Similar McCornack,
Co-operative Principal,
Manipulation Theory,
Western Discourse,
McCornack's IMT,
Levine Nishiyama,
Hopper Bell,
Theory IMT,
VERBAL DISCOURSE,
manipulation theory,
information manipulation,
information manipulation theory,
deceptive messages,
et al,
study found,
violations quality,
relation manner,
quality quantity,
deception types,
et al 1992,
al 1992,
mccornack et al,
deception violations maxim,
violations maxim quality,
|