U.S. Foreign Policy
No one country or nation in the history of the world has ever held as much power, influence, and control as the United States does now in our present day. Within the last century that has passed us by, our country has accumulated so much of its wealth, knowledge, and power because of the simple fact that we have such a melting pot of people. This massive potpourri of ideas from all over the world has lead to such a quick progression in all aspects of our nation: the economy, government, and culture. However, we did not always have such a strong effect on other countries. During the youth of our nation, much time was spent practicing isolationism mainly because of our inability and lack of power to have much authority throughout the rest of the world. Through time, as immigrants arrived from all over the globe, the United States gained prosperity and power. It would be impossible for us to remain isolated from the rest of the globe especially with the great amount of influence that had been accumulated. One of the first instances where we began to involve ourselves in foreign affairs was during the First World War. With no desire to enter the war in Europe, we attempted to remain merely an outside observer. Even though w . . .
Iran then became rebellious and the Soviet Union moved in to help them. A telling example of where short-term gains, otherwise known as desire, were placed ahead of necessity is in the Iran and Iraq conflict of the eighties. When we sent help to the Iraqis to keep Saddam in power while ending the communist threat of Iran, the short-term gain was successful, but we did not look ahead to the long-term implications. I am not saying that the situation with World War I had an unfavorable outcome; I am arguing that short-term gains can also have negative effects such as the Iraq and Iran conflict in the eighties. What might happen decades later if we continue our biased foreign policy? Rather than giving in to our desires, we should consider necessity for a change and try to see what happens when we do what is beneficial for everyone. Dillard explains how a weasel “lives as he’s meant to, yielding at every moment to the perfect freedom of single necessity” (211). That is why necessity has to be defined. e eventually entered the war later on, while the Allies were fighting, we actually supplied them with different types of equipment such as food and ammunition. The major issue right now is whether or not the United States should continue to show such unbalanced support for this conflict. Necessity is something that needs to be analyzed in every situation. One current example where the United States is favoring one group over another is creating such a disturbance and chaos across the globe. In almost every case, when one person helps another, there is some sort of compensation or result that is expected back from the aide whether or not the receiver of the help is aware of that. To resolve a situation fairly, there can be no bias toward one group. Even a country like the United States should consider placing its necessities over its desires. It would only seem obvious that we give our support to them.
Common topics in this essay:
, Living Weasels, Iran Iraq, World War, United America, Iraq Iran, England France, Congress Israel, Iraqis Saddam, Branson Israel, short-term gains, foreign affairs, foreign policy, world war, world war desire, iran iraq, dillard explains, united help, iraq conflict, communist threat, iran iraq conflict, conflict eighties, |
Acceptance Essays
