Who Should Be Eliminated
I, a senior medical officer in Ottawa, have been approached by a group of people who have survived a devastating biological weapons attack. I thought that I was the sole survivor of this attack but am relieved to find out there are seven other survivors. The group of seven survivors do not know how to approach a dilemma they face and have come to me for advice on their current situation. I had decided there was no one else around to help the group, so I took it upon myself to give the group the best advice possible.Before I provide advice to the group, I should briefly outline the facts. Firstly, a 45-year-old male professor attacked an 11-year-old boy. He believed they could survive by consuming the boy's body. The boy had become unconscious as a result of the attack and may remain unconscious permanently. As a result of this incident, the group had tied up the professor. The remaining members of group also consist of a 40- year-old female lawyer, 30 year-old woman who is expecting her first child in two months, a 55-year-old female pediatrician, a 60-year-old clergyman, and 18-year-old female university student. The most pressing fact about this situation is the fact that the supplies they have will only last ten d
From the point of view necessity "knows no law" Dudley and Stevens would not be guilty of the murder of the cabin boy because their killing was crucial for their survival, in other words they "had to commit" it. The facts are definitely a key to the application of the Doctrine of Necessity in this case. Now I will evaluate who will remain and who will be eliminated in the group based on the normative systems of law, morality, religion, custom, and etiquette. The professor posses no morals or values for human life. , Looking at Law : Canada's Legal System, 5th ed. In our society we must respect our elders, also, she would be an asset because of her knowledge of medicine and delivering babies. In applying our legal and normative value systems, it is morally and legally wrong to have intercourse with an 11-year-old boy. In the end, the cabin boy was eliminated out of necessity for the remaining to survive. Next, I would choose the 30-year-old woman who is pregnant. Three people must be eliminated in order for the group to have any chances of being rescued, the supplies must last as long as possible. Two other normative systems that are relevant to consider are morality and law. Morality is often considered to be comparative while law must be certain, predictable, and consistent. After carefully analyzing and applying the Doctrine of Necessity to their current situation, I came up with the pros and cons of eliminating three people using normative systems. He would be a good candidate to sustain the group's life into the future that is if re-population becomes a concern afterwards.
Common topics in this essay:
University Oct4,
,
Doctrine Necessity,
Dudley Stevens,
Dudley Stephens,
Legal Studies,
normative systems,
normative system,
Atkinson Lecture,
law morality,
11-year-old boy,
morality law,
based normative,
Legal System,
Law Casebook,
normative system etiquette,
systems law,
etiquette custom,
current situation,
law morality religion,
referring normative,
based normative systems,
systems law morality,
normative systems law,
Markham Butterworths,
|
Acceptance Essays
