Gun Privacy
The article I chose is about a Gun privacy case that the Supreme Court is debating whether "the government can withhold information on some gun purchases and crimes, including details of database checks like those used to track weapons in the sniper case". Bush and the National Rifle Associations believe if that by releasing this information to individuals, it will be invading people's privacy. Whether this case wins or loses, the chances are that either way it would not prevent crime or control guns in the United States. Gun control is an action of the government to reduce crime. So many laws have passed and still there has been no effect. So whether the government releases the information from gun owners to individuals, it still would not be effective. Gun control has been an issue for years and there
Guns do not kill people, people kill people. If our former Presidents believed we have the right to ownership of guns for either protection or hobbies, it is more likely that guns will never be banned. What right does the government have to take that from an individual who is not hurting anyone? There are several major anti-gun control groups, such as the National Rifle Association and The Gun Owners of America, whom believe that citizens are "entitled to the ownership and legal use of firearms". We as individuals should have a right to own and possess a gun to a certain instinct. For instance, the Brady Act, which stops criminals from purchasing guns. We should only worry about ourselves and loved one, and make sure we can protect ourselves from criminals. Instead of people trying to ban guns altogether, they should just educate people how and when to use guns to protect themselves. These individuals should not have their guns taken away because of armed felons. Guns will never leave our country, if some reason guns are banned, they will enter the United Stated illegally. While banning guns and releasing information from individuals will not prevent guns from society, it only takes more freedom from Americans. It should be only certain criminals because what if someone was convicted for drinking and driving, should he or she be able to own a gun? Yes, because if they do not purchase the gun correctly, they will find someone off the street who will sell them one illegally. One major reason that guns might never be banned is because we have former President George Bush and Ronald Reagan that are members of the National Rifle Association. We should work together, instead of debating whether guns are good or bad, we should educated ourselves more on guns and not worry about who owns a gun. In Chapter 12, it talks about whether the National Rifle Association is too powerful or influential? In my opinion, no, I agree that a person who owns a gun should not be held responsible for others who use guns unlawful.
Common topics in this essay:
Rifle Association,
Brady Act,
United Stated,
United Gun,
Supreme Court,
Rifle Associations,
Owners America,
Americans Guns,
Gun Privacy,
National Rifle,
national rifle,
guns banned,
national rifle association,
rifle association,
reason guns banned,
gun control,
kill people,
releasing information,
information individuals,
guns protection,
owns gun,
releasing information individuals,
information gun,
|
Acceptance Essays
