Consensus Change, Conflict, and
In this particular article form the Journal of Psychology, the participants were a model of British students that were measured for relationship satisfaction. The major aim of the present study was to determine whether relationship satisfaction and negative conflict resolution are associated with consensus change as well as consensus level, and association is stronger in those showing decreased rather than increased consensus In this study, Cramer started with 108 participants but 2 of these said that they never had difference in opinions and fourteen students were excluded because of missing data. He was then left with ninety-two students in which sixty-two were women and thirty were men. The average age for both men and women participating on the study was twenty. The mean duration of their romantic relationships was 3.52. Only three relationships did not report duration so the mean was solely based on 89 participants. Cramer used four multi-item scales to measure the participants' relationship satisfaction. The first scale, the Hendrick Relationship Assessment Scale, consisted of seven items, which had to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale. This scale contained questions such as, how satisfie
Does this mean that statistics shown are false or the experiment as a whole is just not representative? One of the main critiques I have on this particular article is the fact that participants were asked to answer the questions in terms of either their main romantic relationship at the time of the study or their closest friend if they did not have a romantic partner (Cramer, 2001). This scale was based on eight items: money, recreation, demonstrations of affection, friends, sexual relations, correct or proper behavior, philosophy on life, and ways of dealing with parents. In the materials they used, the scales, participants could have lied. Asking a person questions that evolve around minor or major issues and explain them can vary a lot from person to person. Significant correlation in relationship satisfaction was found in all four measures apart form consensus change. Cramer mentioned that the casual relationship between consensus, negative conflict, and relationship satisfaction could not be ascertained from this study because of its nonexperimental design (2001). My suggestion for any future research on this topic is to focus more on actual couples rather then randomly selected persons. The ninth item referred to any other major issue (Cramer, 2001). Although this article has significant findings, I am not too convinced with the outcome. d are you with your relationship? The higher the scores were on this particular scale, the greater the satisfaction in the relationship. Two other pieces that might influence a person relationship satisfaction that were not mentioned as well are religion and communication. Asking question on a scale could face distortion for the simple fact that the participants might be embarrassed of saying that they were not romantically satisfied or whatever other reason. Some peoples satisfaction levels differ from others as we as what one participant might view as a major issue, the other might view as a minor issue and vise versa. Since Cramer did not mention how the participants were chosen, I have concluded that they were randomly selected. The last scale used to measure relationship satisfaction in this study was a combination of an eight-item Negative Conflict Handling subscale and an eight-item Negative Conflict Outcome subscale of the Differences in Opinion Scale.
Common topics in this essay:
Opinion Scale,
Journal Psychology,
Consensus Scale,
Assessment Scale,
relationship satisfaction,
negative conflict,
,
consensus change,
Conflict Handling,
cramer 2001,
satisfaction negative conflict,
relationship satisfaction negative,
romantic relationships,
romantic relationship,
satisfaction negative,
Conflict Outcome,
scale scale,
Negative Conflict,
associated consensus change,
involved romantic,
involved romantic relationship,
ranging means,
eight-item negative conflict,
|