Public display of religious symbols should be banned in secu
Public display of religious symbols should be banned in secular institutionsIn December of the year of 2003, French President Jacques Chirac proposed a law to ban conspicuous signs of religious belief from state schools and public buildings. The ban would include the wearing of Muslim headscarves, Jewish skullcaps and large Christian crosses. In my opinion, the ban is discriminatory and will create more problems than it solved. People all have right to choose and wear what they want and everyone should respect others' consuetude of their religions. The threat to people's security and liberty is through violence and ideas, not religious symbols and wearing. The ban may create radicalism and have the effect of further isolating Muslims and fueling the perception that their faith and culture are under siege. The ban may be counterproductive.Everyone has right to choose and wear the wearing of his or her religions. The new law bans the religious wearing in the public places is not fair and a denial of personal rights. Public place means every
Instead of fighting against Islamic radicalism it might encourage it precisely because of this feeling of stigmatization. For the half of the century, especially after the 9. A lot of radicalize adherents of a minority faith, who may already feel alienated from the majority culture of society. In that case, it may make a vicious circle, more Muslims become ultraists because they think they have been insulted, and more fear the other people who are not Muslims will have. Feda Abdo who is a Muslim and editor of Sydney Muslim youth magazine says "the hijab is more than a simple piece of cloth on your head. Some people who support the ban say that students can be cut off from others because of their religious wearing. The Muslims think the ban is a kind of insult and shame. Wearing Hijab or Burqua which are the two main kinds religious wearing of Islamic women causes no harm to anyone. As same as we cannot recognize all the Muslims are terrorists because some extremists destroy the two towers, we also cannot stop all the Muslims wearing their religious dressing because some people feel uneasy about the fundamentalists who are few of Muslims. one has right and opportunity to go, no body has that right to stop them because of their religious symbols. Many Muslim feel singled out by the bill and believe the real motive for the restriction is a fear of Islam. French national ombudsman Bernard Stasi says the law aims to counter "forces trying to destabilize the republic". 11 terrorist attack in NY, many people of the west may be uneasy about fundamentalist Islam, and even make equal sign between it and terrorists, but the wearing of the hijab may be the wrong target to pick to express this concern.
Common topics in this essay:
Jacques Chirac,
Sydney Muslim,
Bernard Stasi,
Jewish Christians,
Muslims Muslims,
Hijab Burqua,
Muslims People,
,
islamic women,
religious wearing,
religious symbols,
religious dressing,
choose wear,
Abdo Muslim,
fueling perception faith,
create radicalism,
wearing religions,
fueling perception,
radicalism effect isolating,
ban create,
effect isolating muslims,
radicalism effect,
muslims fueling perception,
isolating muslims fueling,
|
Acceptance Essays
