Zero Population Growth is a non-profit organization engaged in the task of educating people about the issues of how to keep people, resources, and the environment in equilibrium. It can be assumed that the world can only support a certain amount of people before resources are depleted. The term “zero population growth” simply means that no more people are added to a country’s population. This is achieved when the number of births equal the number of deaths therefore there is a stabilization ratio (births/deaths) of one. Of course this is easier said than done.
Mainly this movement is targeted towards developing countries because statistics show that is where the highest rate of growth occurs. When nations start to develop, more resources are consumed. Therefore population growth can be strongly associated with the environment. The correlation here is quite simple to understand. Breaking down this idea we know that people need to eat. So agriculture comes into play. Cows for example are a source of meat but in order to maintain a plentiful livestock, they need to land to graze on. Water is also needed for daily life and with only 3 percent of all water in the world is freshwater; we can say that eventually our water s
. . .
The economy would probably plummet because of increased prices of goods. This belief may be a factor in the high growth rates of developing countries. By being the child bearer, it is their way is fitting into their society. My opinion is that developed nations think that the majority of developing countries have a high population growth rate so one can argue that the more people there is, the more food is going to be consumed. If the world is over populated, people are afraid that there might not be enough food someday. Without natural resources, the infrastructure of what makes an industrialized nation work would begin to fail. By offering women life choices other than childbearing, chances are they will have fewer children. I believe that natural resources will continue to decline no matter what and it is up to our generation on how to conserve and utilize what we have wisely. But the real reason why developing nations are targeted could be that instead of industrialized countries cutting back on carbon emissions; instead they are indirectly trying to stop the growth of developing countries because they know that a growing country will lead to more industrialized centers which will produce more carbon emissions.
I think the Zero Population Growth (ZPG) movement would appeal to more affluent people in prosperous countries because industrialized nations consume the most resources. That is what I think Zero Population Growth is trying to achieve by reaching out to these countries. In conclusion, achieving zero population growth sounds good in theory but probably will not work in the reality because humans are unpredictable. Personally, I think reaching a zero population growth would be impossible because no organization or government has the power or right to determine how many people should live on this earth. I think industrialized nations are afraid to admit out loud that they are the major contributors of global warming. The role of a woman is to be the child bearer in these societies and take care of the family.
Approximate Word count =
822
Approximate Pages =
3 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|
