94th and 99th session of congress

America the land of freedom, the land where US citizens themselves choose which leaders will represent their diverse community. The leaders are chosen through elections held for positions in office. Each election depending on which party, and which candidate was chosen determine the outcome of the how productive the next session of congress will be. When thinking about sessions of congress the only variable that is normally thought about is the political differences of congressmen, but when comparing two sessions such as the 94th and 99th issues like majority party, presidential veto, diverse bills and leadership make each session of congress greatly distinct, yet at times sensibly similar.

Both the 94th and 99th session of congress possessed a group with very elite leadership.

With Thomas O’Neil, the speaker of the house in the 99th session, serving in the Pacific Wet, awarded the Bronze Star, and re-elected 3 times, leadership during the 99th session seemed to be of high quality. Carl Albert, graduate of Boston College, House Speaker for 5 sessions, and member of the select committee on Campaign Expenditures also showed the great guidance during the 94th session. O’Neil served his country in the Wet Pacific, an act th

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

One veto that Reagan is noted for was a bill imposing sanctions on the apartheid regime in South Africa. He used his authority very sparingly, noting the true concerns of the people. While serving he was awarded the Bronze Star, for serving with the Army of the United States, that distinguished himself by heroic and meritorious achievement. With the interim truce agreement, recession and non-military appropriation bills, it seems congress had more of a military agenda during the 94th session.

From session to session the impact of the president within the congress changes, based on the veto power of the president. Schlesinger had tended to favor a firmer line against the Soviet Union, and Colby had struggled with mixed results to handle public scrutiny of the scandal-plagued CIA. In November 1975, Ford requested the resignation of Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director William Colby.

The 94th and 99th session of congress paved the way for the improvement of the sessions of congress that were to come. The veto, however, may be abused, an act that now many are questioning about Ford. Then, when recession became the Nation's most serious domestic problem, congress shifted to measures aimed at stimulating the economy. O'Neill was instrumental in bringing about the resignation of President Richard Nixon following investigations into the Watergate affair, and he instituted many reforms within the House of Representatives. The objective of the veto is usually to maintain a constitutional order by enabling each important office to protect its own authority, thus preventing over centralization, and constitutional violation. The 94th session of congress’s first goal was to curb inflation. Without congress vetoing military apprpriations during the 94th session of congress an increase in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods and services would have resulted in a continuing rise in the inflation causing high unemployment. Only Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz, and Secretary of the Treasury William Simon remained in their posts.

Approximate Word count = 1144
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.