Subjects:
Throughout Thoreau’s essay civil disobedience he talks about how our nation is unjust and how anyone who partakes in even paying taxes is doing an injustice, in which he did jail time for. Although I believe that Thoreau makes many good points and is right by what he says in many cases, but for anyone to actually live a just life in his eyes is not logical. For example, he throws out the idea that a person must sacrifice their values to support the government. For Thoreau this is not a just way of living. He believes that if individual compromises, negotiates, or passively accepts, it is the same as committing a cri
. . .
Socrates also believed like Thoreau that nothing is more important than a person’s morals. Therefore in that sense Thoreau is not breaking the laws by which he lives. He said that people who value democracy are moral sellouts. He implies that it will make the people think if it is worth arresting and wasting time on a just man. Socrates would run into the same problems that Thoreau did if he had lived in a democratic nation with the laws that we have. Socrates was not trying to break the law; instead he was trying to help the young to understand the just way of living. Well maybe not exactly but my point is both of these men believe in the same way of living their lives and if they are prosecuted or punished for that than they are considered to just by their beliefs, and to them their doing the right thing. If they would both be punished for the way they lived they would be in following their moral beliefs, in which would make their behavior just by their standards. In Socrates’ era there were not as many laws to be broken and there were no real true forms of government like we have today. Individualism was a main point in Thoreau’s theories. These men both lived by the same moral values, however, the fact that they lived in different societies and eras makes the argument seem virtually invisible.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.