Subjects:
The idea of food is constantly used throughout Mary Rowlandson’s narrative, because it was the one essential physical desire that she needed to survive her captivity. Before her captivity, Mary Rowlandson was the wife of a Puritan minister that knew nothing of what suffering and affliction was like (Rowlandson & Salisbury, 16). We know this because Rowlandson stated, “Before I knew what affliction meant, I was ready sometimes to wish for it” (Rowlandson & Salisbury, 112). Rowlandson also stated, “One hour I have been in health, and wealth, wanting nothing: But the next hour in sickness and wounds, and death, having nothing but sorrow and affliction” (Rowlandson & Salisbury, 111). We can infer from this statement that Rowlandson and her family had always had plenty of shelter, clothing, and especially food before being captured by the Indians.
After the February 10, 1675 attack by the Narrhaganset Indians on her Lancaster home, Mary Rowlandson described the attacking Indians as “
. . .
As Rowlandson began to grow hungrier, she had to hold back her personal views towards the food of the Indians in order to survive. Rowlandson later described the liver as a "savory bit" (Rowlandson & Salisbury, 81). This is another example of how food and hunger changed her life during her captivity. After eating the liver Rowlandson quoted a verse from the Bible, Proverbs 27:7, to explain her liking of the food of the Indians. The reoccurring idea of food and how Rowlandson’s taste for it changed throughout the narrative could be used as a metaphor to show also how her identity has changed from what it was before her captivity.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.