Napster

people has free music that they do not have to pay any pennies, and how many people

download the music? thousands, million, and how much money that companies has lost. other social system which business operate. Naspter has hurt lots of

business Naspter has big deals, revenue of new software that Shawn developed, Napster

should negotiates with company that has the right on those songs to share of benefits to

both parties. Smith will say about Christy problem is not

HMO problem that Health Net has the right to declined to transplant for Christy because

it had decided to classify such transplant as “investigational” or “experimental”, and

Health Net was not required to pay for investigational procedure. Just like Christy, if we talk about moral, HMO must willing

to help to pay what ever cost with a cancer patient, because they knew that a cancer

patient will die, patient will not live long, these poor cancer patient will die in a very,

very short time, but no, this HMO do not even care about human, human can be just like

an other animals as the way HMO comport to Christy.

Both Naspter and individual has wrong doing, they have no moral, because this

considerateof stealing other people possesses. “ Bertelsmann’s E-

commerce group strikes a deal with Naspter, loaning it an estimated 50 million to

develop a legal file-sharing system. There is red tape at HMO try to prevent the

transplant, Dr.

If we discuss the responsibity and morally wrong to a person to use Naspter’s website

and software to make a copy of copyright music then who is moral wrong and

responsible? I think all people get involved has fully responsible for their action, because

the Naspter’s company must post the regulation on the website to warn users

who access to their website must have to agree the rules, so people aware this music is

not download for free because the music have copy of copyright to other party, that they

might have to have full responsible for their action. The capitalist is good and

without private property there is no incentive for individual to work, and there is no

competitor between business, it might be good with out capitalism because the way they

do thing of private property is some time unacceptable, but capitalist had had a great

improve of business for individuals and public and event government, however, worker is

the one still have to scarify with capitalism, but still better with communism, if we

compare capitalism and communism which one have better economic.

The two cases Naspter and Health Business are differences, but both cases have the

same situation, the main reason concern is about money.

“By letting individuals tap into each other ‘s tune, Naspter has created the world’s

biggest bootleg record collection.