Downloading Music
"Downloading Music: Useful or Harmful?"Napster, the original creator of free music shareware over the internet, developed a concept that changed the music industry and the consumption of music forever. Napster enabled users to download music from a certain artist in order for them to hear what the artist sounded like before purchasing the entire compact disc. However, people who downloaded a particular artist's entire CD so they would not have to buy it abused this revolutionary concept. While this was not Napster's wish, there was very little they could do to monitor it. The music industry quickly discovered Napster's free distribution of copyrighted material and took them to court. While Napster fought for the relatively new way to obtain music over the internet, the music industry countered them claiming it was wrong to "give away" music for free and would inevitably cut into the entire music industries profits. How often does a person buy an entire CD just for one song? What is the harm of downloading just one song? Does downloading only one song from a CD even hurt the
music industry's profits? These are the types of questions answered in "Downloading Music: Who Gets Hurt?" by Carlton Vogt, a columnist for the InfoWorld website, written on May 4, 2001. Another line that stood out was "And isn't the whole point of performing so that people will hear you?" In writing this line, Vogt reminds reader's that performing should be about entertainment rather than profits. While he has no true credentials, he does have the benefit of an unbiased approach. So I'm either completely neutral or totally out of the loop" helped create the mood of the article. Vogt wrote this article due to all the controversy surrounding the Napster case. Vogt's tone is very informal, trying to keep the reader's interest in his article by sounding friendly and observant. In fact, I can't remember the last time I bought one. "Not only has the artist not gotten his money from the sale, but also I haven't heard the music," declares Vogt. Vogt attempts to persuade the reader by stating that as long as you were not going to buy the CD, downloading a few songs is all right. " However, his article seems to support the Napster concept. He also tries to persuade the reader that it is the artist's job to perform, and they should be happy if their music is listened to. Vogt's article is concise and understandable, which is what counts when you're trying to get a point across. He touches on the points that people who are familiar with downloading music are uncertain about, making sense of them.
Common topics in this essay:
Vogt Vogt,
Harmful Napster,
Vogt Napster,
Carlton Vogt,
downloading music,
music industry's,
music internet,
music industry,
Downloading Music,
persuade reader,
entire cd,
music downloading,
album sales,
cd buy,
downloading song,
|
Acceptance Essays
