Subjects:
Forensic science used in criminal justice has recently been revolutionized with new DNA technology, but fingerprinting is still the most valid and effective form of identification used in law enforcement today.
Going back in the time of ancient Babylon, fingerprints and ridge patterns were used on clay tablets for business transactions and governmental procedures. By the 14th century, the fact that no two prints were alike was becoming more noticeable, thus the history of the fingerprint began (Von Minden 1).
Noting the ridges, spirals, and loops in fingerprints, Marcello Malp
. . .
Famously, in 1891, Juan Vucetich, an Argentine Police Official, was the first to identify a criminal with their own fingerprint.
When taking a print from a crime scene, the easiest to preserve is the latent print. His system was solely based on comparing the size of body parts, such as the skull, legs, feet, etc.
Finally, in 1901, Sir Edward Richard Henry revised Galton’s classification system and started the Henry Classification System which is still used to this day (Von Minden 3). After taking the lives of her two sons, then slitting her own throat, the perpetrator, known as Rojas, had left her bloody prints on a doorknob, which correctly identified her as the murderer. The Henry Classification is mainly used for the manual filing of fingerprint cards. Then, in 1823, a professor of anatomy at the University of Breslau, John Evangelist Purkinji, discussed nine fingerprint patterns in a published thesis, but still did not take notice to the individuality of each print (Von Minden 1). It was found that they were identical twins with shockingly similar prints. If the loop is arching toward the ulnar bone, it’s classified as an ulnar loop If the loop is arching toward the radial bone, then it’s classified as the radial loop. Though fingerprints have been used for thousands of years, the present systems of classification have only been utilized in the past 100 years.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.