Julius Ceasar
Julius Caesar best fulfills the qualities of great leadership between Alexander, Hannibal and himself. He was not just a great military leader; he excelled in the field of politics as well. The attributes of greatness are defined in many ways: bravery, ruthlessness, ambition, convincing, deceiving and risk taking. The one man that best exemplifies these qualities of great leadership is Julius Caesar. When the time was "ripe for a great leader," there were three candidates on sight - Crassus, Pompey and Caesar. Caesar was the weakest; he had neither the money nor the armies. Crassus, on the other hand, was very wealthy and he had a lot of supporters. Pompey was the "great military conqueror" and had amassed money and men. So, Caesar envisioned a plan. He had great ambition an
] leaving Pompey dead and giving Caesar control of Rome. Victorious Caesar was also deceiving and convincing. Even in Gaul, when his troops were surprised by an onslaught of Nervii, Julius took great charge. d decided to encourage the enmity between Crassus and Pompey. He deceived his opponents in Rome so they would not suspect his aims, and they did not. Pompey's army was defeated at Pharsalus, in Thessaly, on August 9, [48 B. " He "installed a gilded throne in the Senate but stayed seated in the presence of standing senators. " In conclusion, Julius Caesar was a great man. It was a risky plan for a minor rival. Julius Caesar was a leader, not a follower! "I came, I saw, I conquered. Julius became consul and, "within a year, governor of the two Gauls.
Common topics in this essay:
BC Julius,
Julius Caesar,
Victorious Caesar,
Caesar Caesar,
Alexander Hannibal,
Rome Julius,
Caesar Advancing,
Thessaly August,
Rhodes Julius,
julius caesar,
Julius Caesar's,
crassus pompey,
spanish tribes,
qualities leadership,
ambition convincing,
convincing deceiving,
ambition convincing deceiving,
|
Acceptance Essays
