Evolution - Is It Scientific?
As I was growing through my school years, the principle of evolution was presented as a fact. My teachers believed that it was the "only way it happened." I too was entrenched into this mode of thinking. How could all the knowing scientists, films, and textbooks be wrong? It did seem to explain how things happened in the past. After all, the mission of science is to systematize knowledge; therefore, all seemed to be logical. I did not question the possibility that the scientists could he in error until my sophomore year of college. At that point in my life I started to approach the idea of evolution from a standpoint of: Anything in science, to be scientific, must be logical. There seemed to be some major problems in the inherent theory (logic), of the entire scenario. Evolution in the extended sense can be defined as a directional and irreversible process occurring in time, which in its course gives rise to an increase of variety and an increasingly high level of organization in its products. In essence, the doctrine of organic evolution postulates the ascent (evolutionists call it "descent") of life from simpler forms. The order is noteworthy: disorder to order; simple to complex, all happening via spont
If you were to gather all the fossil evidences of man's supposed evolution, they would fit on two large table tops. " Since 1957, trends suggest a continuation of this phenomenal aging process. Also, there is too much Argon - 40 in the earth for anymore than only a small fraction of it to be generated by potassium - 40 decay. I still hear so called reputable scientists claiming that this or that has been carbon dated to 35,000 to 40,000 years. We simply cannot know if it started with 100% new. ) All the above have serious problems. SUMMARY: Evolution is the theory that all forms of life are descended from one or a few ancestors by natural processes operative today. The answer is: Environment does not affect genetic code. What should have been easily observable did not happen, even though the numbers where done in extreme excess in experimentation. The system involves three distinct, independent and well know radioactive decay sequences. The hypothetical process of evolutionary change somehow (?) preserves only those rare mutations which are beneficial. Adolph Knopf, a well known geologist of Stanford and Yale, gave the following time Vs time analysis: "In the recent years our earth has been aging a billion years each decade. NOTE: THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A DOCUMENTED, CHANGE FROM ONE SPECIESTO ANOTHER! ONLY LIMITED CHANGE WITHIN THE SPECIES! It is understandable that scientists are trying to order our world. The evolutionist's idea of natural mutations aiding an organism to increase its complexity to better its chance of survival is certainly not logical nor scientifically observable.
Common topics in this essay:
EVOLUTION HAPPENING,
CHANGE SCALES,
RADIOACTIVE METHODS,
Yale Vs,
Empire Building,
Russians Germans,
Harvard University,
,
CHANGED SPECIES,
Lead POTASSIUM,
change genetic,
law entropy,
law thermodynamics,
change species,
coal period,
change organism,
strontium 87,
empire building,
acceptance devoid scientific,
radioactive element,
dating materials,
penetration coal period,
universal acceptance devoid,
nearly universal acceptance,
devoid scientific basis,
|
Acceptance Essays
