Feedback Form
Quality
Research
Material!

I challenege anyone to oppose mainstreaming

Special education is a very controversial issue in education today. There are insane debates that question how much money, time, and effort should be spent on students with special needs, and how should these funds be divided among the individual students themselves. One of the strategies for dealing with special education students is known as “mainstreaming.” Mainstreaming seeks to include many different kinds of learners in the same classroom, instead of separating students according to their learning abilities (The Goal of Inclusion). Consequently, educational methods have changed vastly over the last two decades regarding mainstreaming. Inclusion has become critical in every classroom.

There are many different attitudes regarding mainstreaming. Some parents of children without learning disabilities feel that mainstreaming hinders the productivity of their “normal” child’s development with in the classroom, as well as the numerous costs (Koch, Students with Disabilities 3). Supporters of mainstreaming feel that all learners will benefit

Page 2

from an inclusive classroom. Also, it is a law to provide necessary resources to students for learning purposes and all will be

. . .

I feel that this is essential for children to witness and learn about at an early age so that they will be prepared for the future that awaits them that is also full of diversity. These classrooms not only benefit the student with special needs but it also benefits the nondisabled peers. If we, as a society, truly value each individual as important to society as a whole, then it is vital

Page 5

that we take each child’s education seriously and work toward helping them work to their full potential. Therefore, this is a very difficult task for a teacher or administrator, they need to ensure that both the special needs students and the students without special needs are permitted to learn and produce to their full potential in the classroom. I can see where the angry opponents might think that children with severe cognitive disabilities that prohibit them from achieving the same academic goals as regular education students should not have placed upon them unrealistic academic expectations. There are also many ways that administrators could encourage this kind

Page 3

of interaction. I feel that if teachers are going to isolate the mentally disabled student from the rest of the class, then they just might as well be in their own separate classroom. However, I fail to see and question how this is justification for the whole segregation of the child with special needs. Their role is pivotal in the placements of students

with disabilities.

Contrary to popular belief many people are opposed to mainstreaming. If students with special needs are going to be placed into mainstreamed classrooms, then they should be members of the classroom that get to interacts and participate in every event without being excluded from anything. They will also become more familiar and adapt to the diverse society in which they are inhabiting. When the standard student gets the chance to interact with a child that is mentally disabled, they will have the opportunity to learn from them, and vice versa.

As a future educator, I believe that the administrator is the central figure in determining a successful climate for every student.

Mainstreamed classrooms are becoming an important feature in the education of special education students.

Approximate Word count = 888
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA