Subjects:
First of all, ever since the adoptive system, which was installed by Marcus Aurelius, was never reinstalled after his death, effective leadership in governing Rome was lacking. It was clearly visible that the Roman Emperor was the backbone of Roman stability and therefore the strength of the Roman army was also crucial in ensuing the empire's stability. But this stability was drastically altered when corruption and “necessary” errors were committed.
Secondly, The Roman Empire was plunged into military anarchy and raided by barbarous Germanic tribes causing a major burden from an economic standpoint. Emperors, feeling pressure from all directions, resorted to manners, which depleted army and citizen moral. The personal dream of empirical leaders was never capable of re-stabilizing the Empire after the invasions. For instance, Constantine created a “substantial field force
. . .
Introduced the German element into the Empire. It began as a powerhouse but by some uncontrollable and ignorant errors it collapsed. The legions failed to defend borders; the army began to consist predominately of the peasants (citizenship issue). The lack of soldier loyalty to Rome began with the lack of Rome loyalty towards soldiers. He felt the only way to preserve the Empire was to host all those who wished to live within its territory.
Lastly, before the Civil War the Roman soldier was considered as probably the greatest fighting force in all of the Western World.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.