Political Issues

Actions that stem directly from political issues can almost always be critiqued and criticized by the general public. However, one might come to contemplate about what might such notorious philosophers, such as Machiavelli, Locke, and Hobbes, say about a political movement such as a protest against war. The minds of these great thinkers varied in distinctive ways however their thoughts conveyed or at least had similar focal points. What will be analyzed and deduced from their writings is what each philosopher would probably comment about a protest held against a war with Iraq.

However, what must be noted are the origins of the war and the many possible reasons in which the protest is being held. This is very essential because the opinions of these philosophers will sway greatly if the motives of the war differ from what the U.S government claims. The first assumption that must be made is that the reasons for going to war would be to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. The reason being security for themselves as well as other countries in which Iraq could possibly harm. A second assumption would be in order to gain control over oil, a natural resource, that is held in Iraq. The third and last noted reason would be

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

S from going to war in order to stop them from killing over oil supplies.

These three phenomenal philosophers vary and compare in many different ways. In his twelfth law, he states that all resources which can not be divided must be shared (rivers etc). Therefore, Machiavelli would certainly not suggest a protest but instead promote the war to get oil. However, there is no code than can justify a punishment to any crime. "

In order to seek peace, one must give up the right to take another’s life. However, this is not assuming that the oil belongs to Iraq, which would be a very justifiable argument. He would suggest the possibility of trade because the labor in which Iraq has done for the oil must be justified with something else. ”

This quote states that the Price, who could be regarded as the ruling power of a state, should have only one concern, which is the responsibility to ensure the stability of a state. He believed that acting immoral would not cause hate among the people, but acting in a way that defers from their needs will conjure hatred in citizens. He feels that although they have the natural right to attain and keep their oil, if they have more than they need, it is no longer justified by natural law.

Regarding the natural rights of those in Iraq, there are many viewpoints.

Locke clearly states that he acknowledges the importance of punishment in a society. Peace however is a concept that is embraced by all.

Approximate Word count = 2020
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.