Last month, members of the Appropriations Committee of the
North Carolina House of Representatives voted to use the power
of the state budget to block the assignment of a book to all
freshmen and transfer students at the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill: Approaching the Qur'an: The Early
Revelations (White Cloud Press, 1999), by Michael Sells, a
professor of religion at Haverford College. Denying public
funds to the reading program unless "all other known religions
were offered in an equal or incremental way," they stipulated
that their prohibition "is not intended to interfere with
academic freedom, but to ensure that all religions are taught
Even if well intended, however, the move does, in fact,
demonstrate the significant and growing threats to academic
freedom that can occur in times of economic and political
The controversy began in June, when three unidentified
freshmen sued the university in federal court, arguing that
assigning the book inappropriately blurred the
constitutionally mandated separation of church and state. The
legislative committee then took its action, and, in response,
the university system's Board of Governors dithered over
passing a resolution in support of academic freedom -- in
part, for fear of further alienating the state's budget
writers. (A resolution by a committee of the board passed
unanimously on August 22; the full board will vote on the
The legislative committee's move signifies, in a number of
ways, how much the independence of public colleges and
universities may be in jeopardy. First, it inserts state
politicians directly into the administration of a university
by using the power of the purse to censor the curriculum. Ever
since the founding of most land-grant institutions, in the
mid-19th century, state legislatures have refrained ...