Airline security
Stricter Airline Security-Affirmative argument Over the past five months, airline and airport security has been in the news almost daily. The events on and since September 11 have completely changed the viewpoints of many Americans, as well as the world, concerning airline security. Between the 18 suicide hijackers to Richard "the shoe bomber" Reid and the many other terrorists that lurk in the world, flying is definitely not as safe as it once was. I strongly believe that security in airports should be much more strict than it is now, even if it infringes on the people's right to privacy. The last part of that statement is the point of clash for many people because they strongly believe in privacy rights. Before I get to why there should be stricter airport security, I will define a few the main terms in this debate. First of all, stricter security calls for a more systematic, more careful searching of passengers, bags and airplanes for contraband items, like guns, knifes, explosives and anything that could be used as a weapon. I will go into more detail later about different practices to give airports stricter security. Another crucial part of this debate that perplexes many people is the phrase, "right to privacy." Rights to pr
This is where baggage handlers make sure that every bag on board belongs to a passenger on the plane. On that horrific day, 18 men breeched the security of 4 different airports and planes with weapons like box cutters in their carry-on bags. But the threat of more terrorists is still out there. Ultimately, I believe that these stricter changes would not only prevent events like those on September 11, but also they would deter would-be terrorists from even trying to breech the security at airports. The shear loss of life due to problems in airline security makes the need for stricter security even greater. Only passengers who saw Reid trying to ignite the explosives stopped the destruction of the plane. ivacy can be defined as the right to be left alone without unwarranted intrusion by the government, the media or other institutions or individuals. Weekly "mystery passenger" checks should be done at every airport to check that the proper procedures are in place. A few months later, Richard Reid boarded a plane in Paris, France, headed for America with explosives in his shoes. None of the security precautions discovered the explosives. I believe that there are several points of action that airlines and the federal government can take to solve the problems in airline security. Smaller airports cannot afford such amounts, so the fines should be tailored to their income. As I said before, the law calls for bags to be screened with explosive-detection equipment, with explosive-sniffing dogs, with hand searches and by matching passengers to bags. But, after only a month of the extra security guards, the majority of the airports were without the Guard troops. Bags are only matched on flights originating in the United States.
Common topics in this essay:
Pennsylvania Pentagon,
Airline Security-Affirmative,
November Congress,
Bill Rights,
Federal Government,
National Guard,
President Bush's,
Paris France,
Los Angeles,
Richard Reid,
airline security,
september 11,
events september 11,
stricter security,
events september,
world trade,
security airports,
passengers bags,
checked luggage,
trade center,
airport security,
world trade center,
trade center pentagon,
explosive-detection equipment explosive-sniffing,
explosive-sniffing dogs hand,
|
Acceptance Essays
