Death By An Infant

. . .
cle continues in saying that possibly the cause of them doing this is a combination of bad genes and a bad environment. The kids should have gotten four years (until they turn eighteen) then they should have received therapy and probation, so that someone can help them and monitor them. It will help them to hopefully become stable adults. Right…

I don’t to an extent agree with the whole “bad childhood to bad adulthood” thing, but bad genes, no. I’m not saying that they shouldn’t be punished, but they ought to have special circumstances. What I also don’t understand is why they didn’t all receive the same punishment? They each killed someone, why would their punishments alter so greatly?

I think that it’s absolutely terrible what these boys did. None of them should receive a life sentence, their just kids; they still have yet to finish learning right from wrong and common sense. Genes had nothing to do with killing someone else. Even if your great uncle killed someone doesn’t not mean your going to do it too. What I mean is that I don’t think that what they did was intentional, but still very severe. I think that parents are just trying to find an excuse to blame all of the boys’ behavior on. The courts really should have considered this, and paid special attention to it. Even though they are teenagers, they may not have known that what they were going to do would result in death.

Common topics in this essay:
Nathaniel Brazill, Derek King, , Lionel Tate, November Florida, bad genes, life sentence,

Approximate Word count = 337
Approximate Pages = 1 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here