Has the US Government Taken the Best Possible Resolution Aga
September the 11th was the day when emotions ran wild. One year on and the US government now plots its war against terrorism. The question we should ask ourselves however is "has the US government taken the best possible resolution against terrorism?" There can be only one answer, no. The US government has used a cruel aggression against terrorism, which hasn't accomplished its goal, but rather caused more terror in human actions. Hundreds of Innocent Afghans have been bombed due to errors made by the US air force. The attacks on Afghanistan are triggering a future attack on the US or countries rather than stopping it. Terrorism has not been defeated, it still lies behind our backs waiting for the perfect moment to attack.Innocent Afghans are caught in the crossfire between "peace" and "terror", however it seems like the "peace" has sided with "terror". Bombing Afghanistan makes us look like we are real terrorist. The fact that these killings are occurring tells us only one thing, we are hypocrites. However, it is not our fault that these “ignorant” people from the US government believe it is of the best interest for the world to fight against terrorism with extreme force. In an incident with a village wedding party was “accid . . .
These attacks will only increase anger emotions for the Afghans who have lost their loved ones who were killed due to the bombing. However, the striking fact is that the US governments remains unconvinced that they are responsible for the lives in Afghan as it has been quoted 1 “they (the US government) have been reluctant to confirm that air strikes were responsible for the casualties”. However, the survivors of the attack said that they had made no attacks on the US while they were busy partying for a wedding. However, what are chances of that occurring? It is not high. entally” which proves the dangers and vulnerability of the civilians. Contrasting the number of terrorist casualities and the number of civilian deaths is staggering. How can the US government say that their actions are right when it is no different to the terrorist? Shouldn’t the US government be responsible for the deaths of “accidental” bombings on civilians? What have the bombings on Afghanistan accomplished to say that it was worth the risk? Will the US Government keep bombing innocent civilians until they catch Osama Bin Laden? These questions should be given to the US government to think about and they should be able to bring up with the best resolution for their plans against Osama Bin Laden. This will cause nothing but more civilian deaths. Just think about it, if the US would stop using bombs which have more chances in killing civilians, wouldn’t the war be more concentrated with killing the enemy? George Bush and his government is at fault if a second September 11th does occur It would be most likely as an act for revenge. If this target is what the US is looking for, why is it that nothing have been accomplished in catching the target? As the US intelligence has reported, 3“98 per cent of the leadership had survived the US bombings in Afghanistan”, which is a really high percentage. These acts will not stop until the US government stops every terrorist known on earth. The "terrorism" that the US and other countries fears still shrouds our lives. These facts shows us that the US government isn’t just attacking the terrorist who were responsible for September 11th. The US air force claims that the Afghans were attacking the air fighters and that the air force had no choice but to defend by killing them.
Common topics in this essay:
Bombing Afghanistan, Bin Laden, George Bush, Innocent Afghans, , Bin Ladens, osama bin, Osama Bin, osama bin laden, september 11th, bin laden, air force, innocent afghans, extreme force, bombings afghanistan, george bush, real terrorist, civilian deaths, |
Acceptance Essays
