Gandhi vs. King
Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. were civil right activists who took a form of action to obtain equal rights amongst their society. Gandhi moved to South Africa in 1893 to serve the Indian population after failing to establish a legal practice in Bombay. Subsequent to moving to South Africa, he recognized many laws that discriminated against Indians and initiated a change by taking action. Gandhi developed his theory of satyagraba (“soul force”), which implicates social justice through love as well as suffering the consequences. After meeting with a group of Indian nationalists he wrote down his theories in a pamphlet called “Hind Swarf” or “Indian Home Rule”. Martin Luther King Jr. did a non-violent campaign in Birmingham Alabama. Birmingham was one of the few cities where the fourth step in King’s non-violent campaign theory called “direct action” was necessary. Unfortunately, King was jailed on April 12-20, 1963 for violating a court injunction by leading a protest march in Birmingham. While King was in jail, eight Alabama clergymen published a statement criticizing the use of “direct action” and referred to this approach as “unwise and untimely”. While incarcerated, King politely responded to their statement i . . .
King and Gandhi had educational as well as logical reasoning for taking each approach towards unjust laws. Not only with racial or culture issues, but sexuality, and economical class as well. Instead of using and gaining their own knowledge, they rely on objects such as machinery and electronics. Gandhi’s theory can compare to the phrase “one apple doesn’t spoil the bunch”; which means if one person suffers the consequences for what he/she believes in, his/her allies can take on the battle until justice is served. If one experienced what every African American went through during the Civil Rights Movement, hearing the word “wait” would be a great disappointment. All the segregation laws enabled African Americans from being respected as well as dehumanized their soul. Comparison to Gandhi’s theory, Martin Luther King Jr. Although Gandhi and King come from two totally different backgrounds and cultures, it wasn’t complex to compare and contrast the analytical perspective of each of their documents. Going to Birmingham, Alabama during the period of segregation can compare to being at New York during the bombing of the World Trade Center. If all persons have to suffer nothing will get accomplished. Although there are still numerous amount of racial and culture issues, the work of Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. If blacks did not have the freedom to engage in any activity or manifest their knowledge in any public school, they are being cheated out of their human given rights. Despite the advantages of technology, technology has disadvantages for instance; typing on a computer with the attributes such as grammar check will cause one to be indolent and not attempt to write to their best ability. Both Gandhi and King discussed reasons regarding the use of non-violent actions to fight for their rights.
Common topics in this essay:
King Jr, Mohandas Gandhi, Rights Movement, African Americans, South Africa, According Gandhi, Gandhi British, Gandhi King, Luther King, Gandhi Indias, martin luther, luther king, martin luther king, king jr, luther king jr, mohandas gandhi, african americans, mohandas gandhi martin, direct action, gandhi martin, gandhi martin luther, kings non-violent, south africa, birmingham alabama, kings non-violent campaign, |
Acceptance Essays
