Could Gun Control Prevent Tragedy?
A couple of years ago on April twentieth, two teenagers no more than sixteen years of age, decided to wreak havoc on their school. By the end of their fifteen minutes of terror, they had killed thirteen people: twelve students and one teacher, before taking their own lives. And so we have the birth of the Columbine tragedy. Could better weapons control have prevented the Columbine tragedy? I say weapons control, because a lot more weapons than just guns are used in crimes. In fact, more often than not, a knife is used to threaten people, rather than a gun. Whether a knife or a gun, all are weapons of mass destruction; I say mass destruction because any weapon used to kill someone causes a mass destruction. A person doesn't even need a sharp object to take another one's life. What are we to do, ban all potentially dangerous objects? That isn't even construed as a possible resolution, simply because it is improbable. So we move on to the weapons that cause the bigger bang, guns.
These laws somehow made it impossible for the two young men responsible for the Columbine murders to get their hands on any guns or ammunition. Now we have guns and the means to shoot anyone we want, but we won't because somebody could just as easily shoot you. If we can't ban guns or limit their use, than what can we do? The answer: nothing. lians then we have no guns to shoot each other with. Over thirty people will pay the ultimate price to a killer: their life. My answer is clear, no; my reasoning is understandable, people who kill will find a way to do what they want anyway. Drugs are 100 percent illegal, but many people still find a way to smoke a joint after they get home from work. Despite these efforts, people are still getting murdered everyday for motives mostly related to money. Once again, the only people limited to use are the people who don't commit the crimes. The two responsible researched online, and found step-by-step directions on how to build an easy bomb that will cause a lot of damage. This is unfortunately the truth, I'll never understand, but I don't want to, besides, I can't. The people using these guns aren't, by any means, law-abiding citizens, so what makes you think they are going to have permits for their guns? They're not, plus every gun has a unique mark it leaves on every slug, making it very easy to trace back what gun the slug came from, why would they want their name linked to that gun? They may commit crimes, but they are not stupid. So it's the morning of that April twentieth and suddenly the students here a loud bang, not one that sounded like a pop, but more like a boom. The Wild West has been dead for quite sometime now, and there isn't much of a need for a revival.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Wild West,
mass destruction,
columbine tragedy,
columbine tragedy weapons,
tragedy weapons control,
ban guns,
weapons control,
tragedy weapons,
commit crimes,
april twentieth,
|
Acceptance Essays
