Racial and Ethnic Profiling during a time of war
There are many factors that can affect a person's reasoning regarding racial and ethnic profiling during a time of war. One of these factors includes difference of race, the driving force behind an argument that, in the post 9-11 environment, usually occurs between people of European decent and people of Middle Eastern decent. Another factor that can create altercations among citizens is the country's diversity of religious beliefs, many of which preach against other religions. Because of these and other factors, Americans have taken various positions regarding racial and ethnic profiling: they have been angered by it, they have embraced it, or they have taken the dangerous position of indifference.To begin with, the large majority of America's populace that has been angered by the government's adoption of racial and ethnic profiling as a security measure consists of Muslim-Americans and people of Middl
Of course, Muslims are not the only people that are angry with the government for employing racial and ethnic profiling as a security measure. It is necessary for the public to be educated about profiling and to take an interest in the country's security. The liberal, conservative and indifferent views that each individual faction is founded on have emerged from either sensitivity for the targeted groups, feelings of security when profiling is employed, or a lack of knowledge or an apathetic attitude toward the subject. They believe that the authorities are have overstepped their boundaries and that no one will be safe from the prying eyes of Big Brother. This approach may seem cruel and unethical; but in many patriots' world, profiling is necessary to completely ensure the country's safety during this time of war. Finally, both anger and support are intelligent and opinionated views of the subject, allowing room for argument and compromise. Muslims feel that they have been wrongly discriminated against, saying that their religion promotes peace and that the government is falsely accusing them of being terrorists. By remaining undecided, the average person can have a powerful effect on the international community's view of the country. Apathy is formed by an uneducated public, one that feels as if the argument surrounding profiling should be handled by the politicians and the elite. Because each position on the subject has positive and negative aspects, the ideas of "right or wrong" have been blurred, resulting in a national and international dispute, one whose resolution will decide not only the fate of America but also the fate of every nation. Indifference, however, is the most dangerous "view" that the average American can take. Though this approach may seem primitive to many people, it is no less primitive than the acts of terrorism employed by radical Muslim activists; and according to the authorities, any Muslim-man, woman, or child-can be a radical activist. However, there is also a large group of Americans that supports the use of profiling to protect their country. This can have a very negative effect on the country because it is the average citizen that forms the foundation of a country.
Common topics in this essay:
Middle Eastern,
Seeing America,
American Apathy,
,
ethnic profiling,
racial ethnic,
racial ethnic profiling,
ethnic profiling security,
profiling security measure,
profiling security,
security measure,
middle eastern decent,
people middle eastern,
middle eastern,
regarding racial,
eastern decent,
people middle,
|