Goodness thoughts of Aristotle, Martin Buber & Emmanuel Kant

Some people think pleasure is good; others think that pleasure is bad. Aristotle was a man who sought pleasure and believed that pleasure is desirable. Can any person truthfully say that they do not desire pleasure in some form or appearance? No, every person desires, if not strives for, some sort of pleasure in their live. Even though Aristotle sought pleasure, he knew “there are pleasures of different kinds” so he avoided the “bad” pleasures, those that are immoral in their origin. Instead, Aristotle sought the “good” pleasures, those that were noble in their origin. Aristotle then asked if everyone desires pleasure then why do people not feel pleasure continuously. Aristotle answers this in a simple yet complete way; he says that human beings grow weary of pleasure and that the pleasure is derived from activities, so when the activity stops so does the pleasure. Both kinds of pleasure, those that are noble and those that are immoral, perfect the activities they accompany. If you take pleasure in an activity t

. . .

Immanuel Kant was a firm believer in good will and duty. Buber is the most religious of the three authors, bringing God into his essay. None of them believes the same time but both Buber and Aristotle have thoughts on viewing the ultimate and what is best in humans. The world is ideal where God is everything and God encompassed into everything. However, unlike pleasure, happiness does not ever deteriorate. But pleasure is neither the ultimate answer, nor the ultimate goal for Aristotle. He has different views on the world and “world”. ” The two primary words are I-Thou and I-It. The goal and end for Aristotle is happiness or the perfect state. In the end, all the authors would agree that goodness is a admirable trait in a person and people should strive to attain it. Reason must be encompassed into as many of our activities as possible as it is the most virtuous and divine thing a human is capable of. I-Thou is not a comparison “not a thing among things” but truly cannot be defined; such as Love, a there is no way to do justice in defining the word Love. As Aristotle and his reason, Buber believes I-Thou is like a glimpse into the perfect and is the most divine thing humans are capable of doing. In his essay Buber says that “The attitude of man is twofold, in accordance with the twofold nature of the primary worlds which he speaks. I-It is a comparison with a material object, the way most people view the world.

Common topics in this essay:
Immanuel Kant, Instead Aristotle, Martin Buber, Buber Aristotle, Relations I-Thou, Love Aristotle, God God, I-its Buber, I-It I-It, I-Its I-Thou, aristotle sought, martin buber wrote, happiness virtuous, world world, sought pleasure, buber wrote, pleasure pleasure, according kant, martin buber, happiness virtuous activity, goal aristotle, aristotle sought pleasure, virtuous activity,

Approximate Word count = 912
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here