Paying College Players
For several years amateurism has posed a big controversy in college sports. Being a professional athlete is making the final cut, this is when athletes get paid for their talents for the use of entertainment. The athletes are given contracts due to their level of skill and performance. College is for students to get an education and prepare for a career. Most athletes attend college to get an education just in case they don't make it to a professional sport level. College athleticism could be considered a stepping stone, it is a preparation stage for student athletes hoping to move on to the professional level. Many athletes attend college and play sports, but when they get to the professional level, they still aren't capable of performing as well as expected. This is not the case with every athlete though, some of these young amateurs hit the professional league and explode and achieve beyond their expectations. Some of the collegiate athletes hit the professionals and perform better than experienced veterans. In the light of these facts, the question: "Should college players be paid?" is often posed. This question has been tossed around for a good number of years. It has probably been discussed since before college ba
At Notre Dame, for example, grants-in-aid to student-athletes are worth about $5 million a annually. Sports are not promising, any athlete could have a career ending injury at anytime; however, the education they receive will always be able to open doors for them. I think that would take away from our society and economics, leaving us with fewer professionals. Without college most of America's young athletes wouldn't even get the exposure needed to make an impression on for the professional leagues. This is the same thing South Florida coach Seth Greenberg stated when he was asked: "should college basketball players be paid?" in a series of questions asked by The Tampa Tribune (available at tampabayonline. CBS college basketball analyst Bill Packer, in the same Tampa Tribune question series listed above states: "It's a moot question (Should college athletes be paid?). There are many hidden facts that explain the impossibilities to pay our student athletes. The principle is that the only way to eliminate this question would be to pay the college athletes, but that would produce a great decline in the population of education. In light of these facts, many believe that student athletes deserve more than just a scholarship or grant for their efforts. " This is something easily understandable, if colleges could afford this kind of money then they should be able to afford more and better scholarships. Paying college players would completely eliminate amateurism. The opportunity to get an education should be enough, too many people get caught up in the money though. College athletes should not be paid, this would eliminate the sole purpose of attending college.
Common topics in this essay:
Title IX,
Notre Dame,
,
Tampa Tribune,
Division III,
college athletes,
Seth Greenberg,
athletes paid,
college athletes paid,
paying college,
college sports,
millions dollars,
South Florida,
playing sports,
title ix,
play sports,
college players,
basketball players,
paying college athletes,
athletes generate millions,
athletes attend college,
generate millions dollars,
|
Acceptance Essays
