No substitute for safe sex
Sexually transmitted diseases, teenage pregnancy, and marriage failure are problems in the United States. The finger pointing goes every which way. Everyone seems to have their own opinion on how to solve these problems. According to Mellissa Pardue & Robert Rector, our government is sending the wrong messages to the teens of America. Their article "Bad Money for Bad Advice," gives their opinion about the teenage sex issue. Pardue & Rector blame the governments "safe sex" programs, instead of abstinence. The government is spending twelve times more money on "safe sex" programs than encouraging abstinence. The writers believe that abstinence is the best way to lower teen pregnancy and STDs. It is also noted the popularity of abstinence programs among parents for their teens. Pardue & Rector end the article blaming the "safe sex" programs message, because they feel the programs are sending the message that it is okay to have sex, but use protection. The writers claim that "safe sex" programs encourage teens to have sexual relations while at a young age. They set their grounds or data, to be information such as a Zogby poll and the notion that abstinence leads to sexual activity at an older age to higher levels of persona
Those are the parents who are aware and up to date of the times. Hood (2004) mentions that "Condoms aren't perfect-they still can break and they can come off. Abstinence is the only way to steer clear of becoming a teenage parent or being infected with an STD. It is unclear if Pardue & Rector are against all sexual encounters or just traditional sex. Condoms, lubricants, and pills cost money. There will be the select few who will remain abstinent, but not as many who will engage in sexual relations. Hood says abstinence is the way to stay away from becoming pregnant or contracting an STD, but condoms are more reliable than nothing. At the same time they have an educated person on the subject explaining how to use these products efficiently and properly. In the twenty first century, casual sex or teen sex is becoming much more common than it was fifty years ago. The programs that the government pays for will give out many of these products for free. Remez (2000) claims that "Health professionals and policy makers know very little about their prevalence among teenagers. 73 billion dollars on sex educations. It is important to be aware that the amount of money that goes into "safe sex" programs is twelve times more than abstinence programs. Parents always want what is best for their children.
Common topics in this essay:
Pardue Rector,
Tom Carper,
America Remez,
Dr Hood,
Kids BART,
STD Due,
,
safe sex,
Waxman California,
Robert Rector,
safe sex programs,
sex programs,
pardue rector,
Bad Advice,
teen pregnancy,
money programs,
sexual activity,
united government,
pregnant contracting std,
sex abstinence,
programs government,
engaging sexual intercourse,
twelve times,
practicing safe sex,
programs united government,
|
Acceptance Essays
