Effect of TV in Society
Television has become the predominate source of entertainment and news for all over the world. Much of what everybody either, knows, hears, or sees about the world around them is through the television. From OJ Simpson's murder trial to the terrorist act on September 11th. Our information on who to vote for on election day, comes from campaign speeches telecasted on TV. Education in forms of entertaining puppets and people dressed up in animal suits is how our children learn to count to three. Television has become an essential tool in how we exist. Or is it? Is the effect of television on society outweighing the reason to keep it around--information, entertainment, and education? Are two year olds around the world becoming more aggressive then the previous generation because of the violence seen on TV? Are teenagers engaging in sexual acts at a earlier age because they are mimicking what is seen during prime time? Are drugs playing a bigger role in society because of television? Many authors suggest that there is a direct correlation between what is seen on TV and what is happening in society. Is TV affecting our lives or is the media merely reflecting what is already present in society?
tor Stasburger and Edward Donnerstein in Children, Adolescents and the Media: Issues and Solutions, a typical teenager will witness 10,000 acts a violence a year and 61% of those violent acts are aimed at children's programs. Are teenagers engaging in sexual acts at a earlier age because they are mimicking what is seen during prime time? In addition to the evidence that these authors provide about sex, drugs, violence, and self image on TV, the author of Viewing the Box, claims that television ". " Although at particular study didn't make an effort to control other violent inducing-variables, other studies who have concluded the same thing. Should TV be blamed for the increase of violence, sex, drug uses, and poor perceptions? Or is TV showing the world what is already there? Research studies have proven that there is a direct correlation between TV and aggressive behavior but is it enough to discontinue violent programming? . Her article begins with large, women in Fiji, smiling and greeting each other with positive comments on weight gain. "Skeletal and nearly bald, a real teenager with leukemia suffers through agonies of chemotherapy-just after a fictitious teenaged girl (full bodied, and with all of her hair) finds happiness by using Clearasil," states Mark Miller, author of How to Be Stupid: The Lessons of Channel One. All of which deal with abstinence, birth control, or sexually transmitted disease. Are children learning how to become a drunk and traffic illegal drugs from TV instead of their ABCs ? Every year, young viewers will witness 15,000 sexual references. Goodman also states that she knows that eating disorders are a culture consequence, but know one has been keen to recognize the relationship between image and illness. " Although there aren't a lot of studies done to determine the exact relationship between TV and sex, the few studies that are done provide evidence that there is a distinct relationship and that more studies need to be done to determine the damage that TV will cause. If violent TV is viewed at a young age, it largely contributes to the adult aggressive behavior or even criminal behavior that person will engage in.
Common topics in this essay:
Viewing Box,
TV Education,
Center Stossel's,
Women Fiji,
Joe Mouseketeer,
Science Foundation,
Issues Solutions,
Strasburger Donnerstein's,
Families Television,
Fiji TV,
aggressive behavior,
sexual acts,
mimicking seen prime,
sexual acts earlier,
acts earlier,
earlier age,
mimicking seen,
age mimicking,
teenagers engaging,
engaging sexual,
teenagers engaging sexual,
engaging sexual acts,
direct correlation,
seen prime,
acts earlier age,
|
Acceptance Essays
