Comparison of Differnt Animal Experimentation Methods
In the world of animal experimentation, there are two very different sides. One example is the experiments and research conducted to improve the way humans live from a medical aspect. The other side is taken from invasive and redundant experiments that are done to test new cosmetic, personal, and household products. In regards to medicinal testing, there are very positive connotations, which allow us to realize that these tests are being done to help save the lives of those in need. In the long run it is evident that these tests are worth more than the animals that have to die in the process. On the other hand, testing done to improve eyeshadows, soaps, and furniture polish seem to be far less significant. Due to countless differences in the anatomy, physiology, genetics and cell makeup of animals and human beings, there is no foolproof plan that can be used to guarantee
Despite testing toxicity levels on animals, these products were still poisonous and in some cases deadly if ingested by human beings. The funds are for the most part split evenly between both sides. that research done will produce positive results. " To this day, as new vaccines for the disease are produced for today's youth, the use of animals continues. For example toxic products that have been tested on animals such as permanent body wave solutions, oven cleaners, soaps and detergents are regularly introduced into the marketplace. Due to this, the positive affect in humans was unknown and the use of fluoride in toothpaste was delayed. With an effort to spend less money and time on commercial products and research, there quite possibly could be a huge increase in positive advancements from the animal testing done from the medical standpoint. After carefully looking at the benefits of both animal experimentation done for medical purposes and that done to improve cosmetics, personal, and household products, and then weighing them against the amount of money spent on each, it is obvious that the medicinal aspect is far more worthwhile. On the other hand, every year millions of animals are put through extremely painful tests of substances such as makeup, household cleaning products and topical products. For example in 1961, almost thirty years after beginning his research, Albert Sabin introduced his oral vaccine for polio. Subsequently, in 1989 there was a study to determine the carcinogenity of fluoride using rats. With this in mind, using animals in medical tests has also proved to have some benefits. After knowing the focus involved in both types of research, spending the same amount of money for household and cosmetic testing that is spent on finding cures for human diseases and other medical advancements seems ludicrous. Between both medical and commercial research and experiments done on animals, there is close to 5 billion dollars spent annually.
Common topics in this essay:
Albert Sabin,
,
household products,
personal household products,
amount money,
personal household,
animal experimentation,
types research,
|
Acceptance Essays
