Why Did Communism Fail?
With the fall of many Communist regimes in Warsaw Pact states during the late 1980's, many people considered that as the death throes of Marxism and Communism as a viable political ideology and economic model. The final deathblow was actually delivered in 1991, when the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics itself fell apart and the successor states all attempted to move to a free market economic system with a democratic government. Although other socialist states such as China survived the collapse of Communism around the world, they did so only because they adopted economic policies that can be considered capitalist in nature. At present, only North Korea maintained the command economy model based on the theories of Karl Marx and his followers. However, one look at North Korea and it doesn't take a genius to figure out that country is actually in deep trouble.By following events in recent history, we could say that Communism as an economic model has failed in achieving its lofty promises of a classless and equal society. But many people are asking, why did it fail? How could such a system seen by many 50 years ago as a better option to a supposedly decadent capitalist system just fall apart like that? Even as late as 20 years
Capitalism's main premise for social improvement is through individual enterprise while those of Communists is that of collective action. There are two main doctrines that espouse Communism: Marxism and Socialism. But as history would prove to us once again, no man is an island. It is grounded in the concept of free enterprise, which argues that government intervention in the economy should be restricted and that a free market, based on supply and demand, will ultimately maximize consumer welfare. However, it is not for me to say that Capitalism is the ideal system because it has its own flaws. Human societies are formed when individuals live together in communities and agree to protect/help each other from a common threat to survival. Many would say that man's individualistic tendencies could be the cause of his downfall. In other words, Capitalism accepts the existence of economic but not political inequality hence "the rich and poor are equal in law". Then every aspect of society that supposedly reflects bourgeoisie values will be disposed of in order to reach the stage were a classless, equal society could exist. Human beings are more complex than that; we have thoughts and feelings that are unique to each one of us. But the main difference between the two is that contemporary Socialists point out that end could be achieved through peaceful means such as government reform. This is only one of the myriad of cases that proves the individualistic tendencies of humans. However, as we take a closer look, we could see that it boils down to the issue of the real nature of the human species. But as we look back in time, it could be said that history has favored free individual enterprise over coercive collective action.
Common topics in this essay:
Socialism Marxism,
Soviet Union,
Tell I'm,
North Korea,
Stone Age,
Socialist Republics,
Marxism Communism,
Warsaw Pact,
Capitalism Communism,
classless equal,
equal society,
,
classless equal society,
soviet union,
collective action,
towards common,
common goal,
towards common goal,
fall soviet union,
social stratification,
fall soviet,
individual enterprise,
economic system,
|
Acceptance Essays
