Psychological intervention
The paper wrote by Vanessa Pupavac, "Therapeutic Governance: Psychosocial Intervention and Trauma Risk Management", opened my eyes about psychosocial intervention and its consequences on the people. It made clear that, there are many ways for international organizations to help people affected with PTSD's caused by war and violence. Some of them may be more realistic but not helpful to the fullest and others may be harder to achieve but with better results. Of course this depends on the place, culture and people in the talking subject. In her paper she analyses three very good points which are: International Psychosocial model and its origins, how it jeopardize the local coping strategies and the consequences of the pathologisation of war-affected societies. I will discuss them and also briefly talk about the PTSD, which is becoming the main issue in today's international community because most of the war-victims suffer of this disorder. First I would like to say that I agree with most of the points made by Vanessa. Talking about her first one, the origin of the international psychosocial model, she mentions the various types of psychosocial interventions, from the less significant to some more important. It is made
This is because it is convenient for them, because everybody prefers to be victim of the society' bad happenings, rather than fight against it and coming out of it. Also she talks about the treatment of this post-war community, which is very different from the US veterans. Another case can be when the father goes away to the military, the mother has to take all the weight the father on her shoulders. It also gave veterans " moral exculpation" and guaranteed them a disability pension. If we think about it the military gives men a role, an important one. The programmes come in to the community as an outsider and a " better way out" to problems than the locals have. The international model overestimates the number of the traumatized in a war affected community and also the help that the communities in the south need is different than what the Westerners might need. Vanessa gives an example about this by explaining the response of the international psycho-social response in Kosovo, which was to assume that mass trauma was present. One example is Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, which I will talk about more in detail later in this paper. A quote made by Newt Gingrich that states "Perspiration and teamwork will dissolve racism faster than therapy and dialogue", is just an example on how sometimes the fastest and easy ways are right in front of us, but everybody is looking only for the hard ones. The responsibility of the family, the disciplinary guide for her kids and this is all very hard. The international psychosocial model sees the individual as very vulnerable, and does not see the strengths of the individuals. I would talk a little bit more about what it is. Of course man that are not in the military and are in refugee camps have not any specific goal, they are not the economic provider anymore and they are left with more need of community. I think that she is right also by saying that the post-conflict societies are not being able to make their own policies, but the policies are imposed on them.
Common topics in this essay:
Vietnam War,
La Vita,
Stress Disorder,
Western Europe,
Derek Summerfield,
Risk Management,
International Psychosocial,
Gingrich Perspiration,
Vanessa Talking,
Psychiatric Association,
psychosocial model,
international psychosocial,
psychosocial intervention,
international psychosocial model,
therapeutic governance,
traumatic stress disorder,
today's international,
agree vanessa,
traumatic stress,
stress disorder,
situations people,
paper vanessa talks,
post traumatic stress,
western society,
|
Acceptance Essays
