When we speak of democracy one thing that has become clear is the different notions we have of the idea itself. Perhaps, this conflict comes from our own views of what we would like our perfect democracy to be or reflect. This difference of opinions is growing even more nowadays, partly because of the increase of democratic regimes around the world. When a fundamental political, social, or cultural idea spreads as is the case of the idea of democracy, it also gives birth to new versions, views, methods, which as well as strengthening democracy, give it a much needed sense of conflict, so it can keep growing and expanding. So, the question we must ask ourselves in relation to this is, “Where is our conflict with the ever changing idea of democracy, what parts of this idea reflect our own views, and where do we see the need for change?” and perhaps the question for others should be, “Does democracy really exist?”
Do we feel that our democracy fulfills its duties to us, its citizens? Perhaps this is a good starting point, since this question pinpoints a fundamental issue in all democratic regimes. How do we decide which duties are most important and should be the main responsibilities for a democratic government to ful
They include; joint deliberation in the public spheres, individual self-development through participation, universal voting rights and the citizens"tm use of the institutions for participation. Perhaps the most important characteristic is the idea of, "democracy as a way of life, not just as a union of institutions". The rights of all individuals must be protected, and this is achieved by summing up the utilities of all citizens to form political order. So, can these same citizens be truly capable of making unbiased political judgmentsThe third democratic model is one of Competitive-Pluralism. It is only necessary for the citizens to feel that at certain intervals they can realize their aspirations, and they can contribute by selecting the elite (the minority) that will govern them. We are left to think about what are those changes that need to be made in order for a democracy to truly work and survive. However, unlike a liberal-protectorship, this model sees a "political market" which is defined by its pluralism and competition which would produce equilibrium between the many interests and perhaps, "the sovereignty of the consumers", which in fact, is all democracy can aspire to be. With so many different views and ideas as to what a democratic regime should be, can we as a whole society feel that our necessities are being met by our own democratic model This would mean that a truly successful democracy is a system that is self-adaptive to changes within its own environment (state) if it wants not only to survive, but flourish as well. This is because; the foundation of this model also believes political participation of its citizens is necessary for democracy to function. First, is the democratic model of a Liberalisitc-Protectorship. Thus the intervention of the State in the market must be limited. Since the economic market is a mechanism of just distribution and it rewards personal merit, and this market is where human beings find their self-realization (actualization). Another key aspect of this model is the separation of powers, institutionally and territorially as well. This regime agrees with the liberalists that there is a need to protect the individuals"tm interests, but this must be balanced with the demand for political participation of the citizens. It believes that the command of political power is in the hand of an elite minority, and the word democracy is being used to legitimize what is in fact a dominance of the governed.