RESOLVED: THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION SEEING AS HOW ANIMAL TESTING IS INHUMANE AND IMMORAL.
             INTRODUCTION: Animal Cruelty One of the touchiest aspects of our relationship with animals is the use of animals in laboratory sciences. Some manufactures of cosmetics and household products still conduct painful and useless tests on live animals, even though no law requires them not to. Some people, called anti-vivisectionists, are at one extreme in their concern. They want an abolition of all experiments on live animals. At the other extreme there are those who say that it is quite all right for us to do whatever we like to animals. They say that God gave us such a right, since it is written in the bible (Genesis 1:26) that man has dominion over all creatures. If these tests give some educational value, or adds to scientific knowledge, or can help improve human health, they argue that it is worth killing animals or subjecting them to painful experiments. I believe that the unnecessary testing of animals is inhumane and unethical when alternative methods are available. So t!
             he government should stop animal testing.
             MANUFACTURERS: Those that labor, act or skill transforms raw materials into some kind of finished product.
             VIVISECTIONISTS: A person who is certified to cut or operate on a living animal.
             ABOLITION: To completely do away with.
             I. Animal Testing has been around for a long time and many cruel tests have been performed on these innocent animals.
             A. Many experiments come from the US Army and other government funded groups.
             FOX, MICHAEL ALLEN. THE CASE FOR ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION. LOS ANGELES: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, 1986 (PAGE 81): At the Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, experimenters forced sixty-four beagles to inhale radioactive Strontium 90 as part of a larger "Fission Product Inhalation Program" which began in 1961 and has been paid for by the US Atomic ...