The courts decision should be created based on previously set constitutional guidelines, while also incorperating the most beneficial decision for the common people. Regarding the consitutional questioning of vouchers, they remain perfectly legal. However, a problem comes into play when unfair amounts of federal money from vouchers go to religious schools. The people of the United States have a right to choose how their hard earned money is spent, and if they choose not to spend it to send someone to a religious school, that is how it should be done.
             Vouchers are a good idea, but the idea outsteps it's boundries when money is given to religious institution of learning. The money that are used in vouchers come from the tax payers of the state, which causes a problem. The American people have a right to choose to express religious beliefs or to not be subjected to religious practices. If anyone has a problem with their tax payings going to religious schools, then there is a violation of the constitution that should be dealt with accordingly. According to the Cleveland study, 96% of 3,200 students went to religious schools which violates the second rule of the excessive entanglement clause. It advances religious practices on the students who attend the religious schools. However, vouchers are not the only answer to problems with high school defiencies in education. Many other solutions may be compromised in order to correct the existing problems with education. Finally the government should not be concerning itself with religious affairs and vouchers do create that problem. It is the courts stance that vouchers should be either be reformed or another solution to education reform should be made.
             ...