McGuires' references to prior cases and documents is done logically and
             clinically. After careful reading, and re-reading, I failed to understand his position
             How can he perceive that by terminating a human life, this is acceptable
             moral behavior? Moral implies conformity to established codes or accepted notions
             of right and wrong. In other words, the basic moral values of society. Since when did
             society begin to accept that termination of life due to a dysfunction or deformity
             When did society decide that it is their "moral" obligation to determine when
             the "quality of death" supersedes the "quality of life"? Who are they to decide what the
             quality of life should be for that individual?
             Morality is a standard of right behavior, sanctioned by ones conscience and
             ethical judgment. How can any one person in society, using ethical judgment, decide
             when the life of a child is no longer of importance?
             McLaughlin refers to the killing ( word he used in his essay ), of person who
             no longer has the capacity to exist within the quality of life standards. Who set those
             standards? Society? When society decides who is fit to live and who is not, this is
             manifesting themselves as "God". This is morally unacceptable to me. We were not
             put upon this Earth to act as God. We were placed here to do his work, but that does
             not give us the free will to decide who lives and who dies. That is not our decision
             to make. I , for one, do not want to have to supply an answer as to why I felt that a
             disabled or dysfunctional person was not deemed acceptable to society.
             My question still remains as to who takes the responsibility of determining
             who deserves to live and die, based on "quality of life" W
             ...