In the "Hunt for Red October", Tom Clancy explains Marxism by stating that it "...stripped away the foundation of human dignity and individual value. It also cast aside the objective measure of justice and ethics which was the principal legacy of religion to civilized life." Marxism directly refutes the belief in religion and what a religious lifestyle does to a society. When living in a Marxist community, personal morals and values are ruptured and torn away from an individual, they are useless when incorporated with a society merely based on social class and overall stature. Tom Clancy gives a precise description of what Marxism does to a solid diplomatic foundation and by removing religion from an entity only puts unjust materialism and irrepressible hatred back into the core. Throughout my life, I have observed as well as experienced many events where blatant socialism has come into play and battered situations that could have easily been resolved by common moral code.
             Clancy gives a clear description about what Marxism does to a commune. He talks about individual value and human dignity, which closely resembles my personal view on what Marxism can harm if given the opportunity. Marxism, to me, is an excuse to override the power of religion and all that a religious verve embodies. Without ethics and personal morals, our society would be chaotic and way too uniform to individual grow and succeed. By entitling someone to your ownership, places a cement wall above your head. This wall can never be broken down because it is your permanent position in life, entrapped by walls. Giving someone the right to 'own' another individual breaks down the diplomacy of a universal democracy. Causing irrepressible envy and solitary distraught, two sentiments that Marxism directly brings.
             A Marxist society is based on the removal of religion. This is because religion entitles someone to their own personal opinion...