The good without qualification is the unconditioned good. The good will involving the morality of the highest good. The accord with duty vs. from duty is best explained by the shopkeeper example in which the shop keeper could be fair to all customers or try to cheat some with less experience. It all depends on the shopkeepers morality.
             The same exact actions in different instances. Different intentions of the will principles is what Kant means by will equals principles from which action is performed. Pragmatic value equals happiness which equals desire. Good will resolves to reason which is effected by desire or morality. Desire is concerned with results of action. Action is the formal moral principle element from which it is done, the element is the concrete results.
             Duty is performed out of respect, particularity concretes results universally generally. Good will is the unconditional irrespective of particular circumstance. The universal principles are laws that applies everyone. Laws is for everyone and everywhere. Duty is universal law. Objective moment is the moral principles an example is love which is valued universally. It is always everywhere for everyone, a subjective moment which has to do with respect not pleasure or pain.
             The two kinds of theory is descriptive which describes how things are empirical facts and the second theory is normative which is how things should be facts of reason. The propositions from morality involve from duty, the worth in the maxim principle not the purpose achieved result in the world. Another proposition is the respect for law, not out of fear or encouragement. The universal, impartial reason of the purpose particularity. Different bodies are differently constituted happiness is pragmatic. An example would be "don't steal" universal form, "don't steal from people you like" is in particular form.
             Every maxim has matter which is wha...