authorities are appointed by the Church, thus making them society's source on God. It's like pouring religion through a funnel, and the religious authorities' heads are the funnels. Through communication moral problems arise, because it is the first response to all problems. People are supposed to be objective, not only in what they say but in why, where, and how they say it. Objectivity includes relating to enemies and friends by the same standards, as Christ taught. But doing so is unheard of in the world. Nothing in organized religion corrects that problem. These problems are shown in Luis Buñuel's films, El, Nazarin, and Viridiana, in which he addresses the failures of religion and it's authorities. And finally, the issue of hypocrisy practiced by its authorities serves as a problem. Having been born in a nation scourged by inquisitors and tyrants, Buñuel continuously denounced in his work the hypocrisy of the church and its authorities. Francisco Aranda wrote in his book a quote from Bunuel: "Middle class morality, that is for me immoral. One must fight it. It is a morality founded on our most unjust social institutions–religion, fatherland, family culture–everything that people call the pillars of society" (34).
             Wherever people subscribe to a religion or any doctrine of moral excellence, there may arise the sin of hypocrisy. The hypocrite wishes to enjoy the approval of his peers and even the perquisites of a religious office by appearing outwardly moral or religious, while inwardly he is not. Or, where religion makes serious demands upon people's lives. The hypocrite does not pay the price of commitment to the religious life and hence does not reap its spiritual benefits; he remains at a low state. Furthermore, when hypocrites rise to high position, they set a bad example for ordinary believers and bring religion itself into disrepute. This is probably the most serious failure in religious authority. In El, Luis Buñue...