What Jurors Nine and Ten Agreed and Disagreed Upon
             When Sherman L. Sergel wrote 12 Angry Men, many thoughts must have been racing through his mind. In order to write a book with such emotion and thought had to have taken much effort. That most likely holds especially true for jurors ten and nine. Many of the jurors had their differences and their similarities, but none were quite as noticeable as those between jurors ten and nine.
             Juror nine was a very old man who was very thoughtful in his elder years. He really never was involved emotionally, but was always trying to seek the truth, whether that meant putting the boy to death, or letting him live. The old man was the very first man to change his vote to not guilty and he received much criticism from his fellow jurors. But he stuck to his guns and fought for the boy.
             Despite the fact that juror ten had a very bad cold, he was a very mean spirited man, he was even thought to be a bigot. He rarely thought before he spoke, and whatever came out of his mouth when he spoke was usually nasty and loud towards whomever he did not share the same feelings with. Many of his fellow jurors became fed up with him towards the end of their time together, but really did not show it. He really did not speak out too much about the case at hand at all unless he disagreed with someone.
             Although it seems as though jurors nine and ten had many, many differences, they had many similarities as well. In the end, they both agreed that the boy was not guilty and thus deserved to be set free. They also were both getting on in years... but juror ten would not let that affect his role in the jury.
             Even though not everyone truly in their hearts of hearts thought that the boy was innocent, they all agreed that he was. But two men who did think that the boy was innocent in their hearts of hearts were jurors nine and ten. They may never have seen each other ever again, but they probably ...