To pray or not to pray in our public school voluntary prayer in public schools has been a controversial issue since the court ruling in 1963 the changed everything. "Moment of silence", Prayers said in class, and teachers leading bible reading are all forbbiden in public school. But praying in school has many virtue, such as, helping to ease feeling unprotected educating other on different religion, and promoting good morals.
             Inductive reasoning is not a strong point here. It is not really known why prayer is forbidden or said why. prayer has been said to be a cause of something. Istook said , " It has been a n upswing in school violence and disintegrating moral values." (1) This Assumption could be possible to the eye. Still, this would have to be proven.
             Fallacies, example, the ending does not explain why prayer is not allow. This turn in to a extension. "Whether the sate can give public money", Has nothing to do with prayer in school. Post hoc, no prayer means no funds or no funds equal no prayer. These problem are not related. Funding is a way to experience prayer , Non sequitur, I what the ending has stated.
             Argument of authority is not use much. Mass Authority, A June Gallup poll found that 70% of American favor having students start each day with prayer.(1) This make one think the more than half agree to have prayer in school. Could this have been a majority of Christians voters voting for prayer in school.
             Praying has an positive effect on students, a feeling of safety, learning about the kinds of religion, and promote life changes. Payer in school is need as a guide through today and tomorrow, Which prayer provides. The violence has to end someday, why not start with a little prayer
             ...