Miranda Rights

sed if he knew all his rights. The plaintiff was the state of Arizona trying to convict Miranda on kidnapping and rape charges. When the case reached the Supreme Court the prosecution was told not to use the information used in the interrogation room, and that Miranda had given information that he may not of, if the police did not use some tactics that they used (i.e. not telling Miranda his rights).
             The Miranda case solely dealt with the first ten Amendments, (or the so called "bill of rights" amendments). According to Amendment number five anyone including foreigners arrested in the United States has certain rights and privileges that should be spelled out for them at the time of the arrest. These rights are designed to ensure that everyone has the right to due process of the law that states that a person's rights, liberty, and property cannot be violated without a proper trial. Note that if any of the five points listed in amendment number five are violated, the accused cannot be sentenced. These rights have to be described for the accused person in time of arrest. After the trail the Fifth Amendment rights were given the nickname commonly used "the Miranda Rights"
             ...

More Essays:

APA     MLA     Chicago
Miranda Rights. (2000, January 01). In MegaEssays.com. Retrieved 00:56, September 09, 2026, from https://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/17180.html