In his essay, entitled "Art," Clive Bell proposes that there is one
            
 element that coheres all works of art considered great in the world.
            
 "There must be some one quality without which a work of art cannot exist;
            
 possessing which, in the least degree, no work is altogether worthless.
            
 What is this quality'"  In other words, Bell accepts that there must be
            
 some aesthetic standards by which to judge all works of art.  However, Bell
            
 acknowledges that the body of art produced in and by the world's artists is
            
 multifaceted in its character, depending on the era when it was produced,
            
 the artist who produced it, and the medium in which it was produced.
            
       Early on in his essay, Bell states that to define the core query
            
 behind all of art criticism is to ask, "What quality is shared by all
            
 objects that provoke our aesthetic emotions'"  It is not enough to say that
            
 adherence to reality or beauty is the standard, otherwise a functional
            
 Persian bowl might be ranked above a masterpiece of fruit in a bowl painted
            
 by Cézanne. Bell states, "only one answer seems possible - significant
            
 form. In each, lines and colors combined in a particular way, certain forms
            
 and relations of forms, stir our aesthetic emotions."
            
       Thus, although the use of the term  significant form' might on its
            
 surface to suggest that the standards Bell judges works of art by are quite
            
 standardized.  But really, what "significant form" means is the visceral
            
 yet aesthetic impression that a work of art is apt to have upon a gazer.
            
 This is why, for Bell, "people who respond immediately and surely to works
            
 of artâ€in my judgment, [are] more enviable than men of massive intellect
            
 [who are] are often quite as incapable of talking sense about aesthetics."
            
 Bell defends the common gazer, in essence, who looks upon a piece of art
            
 and intuitively responds to its construction.  For instance, Bell might say
            
 that the p...