The term minority interest in  the  balance  sheet  of  Eastman  Kodak
            
 appears in the balance sheet as reported by all the major sources. The  term
            
 is used with a meaning  not  common  in  most  other  applications.  In  the
            
 financial world, the term minority is normally  used  to  mean  a  group  of
            
 shareholders who are not associated with  the  group  who  are  running  the
            
 company. Often enough this group is just interested  in  the  dividends  and
            
 other benefits that they can get from the company. Some companies also  give
            
 large and regular dividends, and this stops the  price  of  the  share  from
            
 increasing very much. These  shares  are  termed  in  the  stock  market  as
            
 "widow's shares" as  a  person  can  depend  on  them  for  regular  income.
            
 However, any share will normally declare a dividend, as that is seen as  one
            
 of the obligations of the managers of the company.
            
       The dividend normally does not yield as  much  as  fixed  deposits  in
            
 financial institutions as the shareholder can earn  much  more  through  the
            
 appreciation of the share price and selling it  when  the  prices  are  high
            
 after having bought the  share  when  the  prices  were  low.  This  is  the
            
 expected action of the "investors". In the case of Eastman Kodak,  the  term
            
 minority interest is shown against the  declaration  under  the  heading  of
            
 liabilities, but not under current liabilities, and  along  with  mortgages,
            
 deferred  taxes/income,  convertible  debt,  long  term  debt,   non-current
            
 capital leases, and other non-current liabilities.
            
       In short this is viewed as a  long  term  liability  to  the  minority
            
 shareholders. The important point to note is that the figure  for  this  has
            
 been shown as N/A for the year ended 31st December  2003,  whereas  for  all
            
 earlier years from 1999, this has been shown  as  0.  The  total  number  of
            
 shares outstanding is also not shown. Is it be...