The landmark Miranda v Arizona decision was rooted in the case of
            
 Ernesto Miranda.  On March 13, 1963, a bank worker in Phoenix, Arizona was
            
 robbed of $8.00.  Police suspected and arrested Ernesto Miranda for the
            
 theft.  By this arrest, Miranda already had an extensive arrest record,
            
 including robbery, burglary, assault and attempted rape and a separate
            
       During the two hour questioning, Miranda was not offered a lawyer.
            
 During the interrogation, Miranda confessed to the theft of the $8.00.  In
            
 addition, he also confessed to the kidnapping and the rape of an 18-year-
            
 old woman 11 days earlier.  This confession was the most important piece of
            
 evidence that eventually led to Miranda's conviction for rape.  He was
            
       Miranda's lawyers appealed the conviction for rape, arguing that
            
 Miranda did not understand how the Constitution's Fifth Amendment protected
            
 him from self-incrimination.  The appeal was unsuccessful at the Arizona
            
 Supreme Court and was then heard at the United States Supreme Court.  After
            
 hearing the arguments, the high court reversed the Arizona court's
            
 decision.  Ernesto Miranda was granted a new trial, where his confession
            
       Despite the lack of a confession, however, Miranda was again convicted
            
 of rape and kidnapping on the basis of other evidence.  After serving 11
            
 years in jail, Miranda was released on parole in 1972.  In 1976, Miranda
            
 was fatally stabbed during a fight.  In an ironic twist, the suspect in
            
 Miranda's murder was read his "Miranda" rights and chose to exercise his
            
       The landmark Supreme Court ruling is one of Chief Justice Earl
            
 Warren's most famous decisions.  In ruling for the defendant, the Warren
            
 court held that defendants who were engaged in a "custodial interrogation"
            
 like Miranda must be informed of their Fifth Amendment before being
            
...