When BankBoston developed its strategy for lending to
            
 telecommunications companies in 1999, it was responding to several changes
            
 in the telecommunications regulatory environment.  The  first of those
            
 changes was not a regulation per se but a ruling by federal judge Harold
            
 Green in `984.  That ruling, the result of an antitrust suit brought by the
            
 U.S. government against telephone industry giant American Telephone and
            
 Telegraph (AT&T), "redefined the structure of the industry." (Rainie, 1999,
            
 unpaged) It divided the U.S. into 1`61 Local Access and Transport Areas
            
 (LATAs), each of which, in turn, had a number of local exchanges.  AT&T had
            
 to sell all of its local exchange business; that spin-off was further
            
 rearranged to form seven Regional Bell Holding Companies (known as Baby
            
 Bells, or, more formally, RBOCs). (Rainie, 1999, unpaged)
            
       All this  spinning off' left lots of room for new companies to enter
            
 the market, and for some older, regional, independent AT&T-era companies to
            
 expand or to enter other markets.  During this time, AT&T, once the premier
            
 telephone top-of-mind name in the country, was relegated to a subservient
            
 position, providing nothing directly to the consumer, but arguably
            
 underpinning the entire telecommunications network nonetheless.  In 1996,
            
 President Bill Clinton signed into law the Telecommunications Act of 1996,
            
 which was the more immediate impetus to BankBoston's development of a
            
 strategy to invest in telecommunications.
            
       The primary objective of the bills that preceded that compromise bill
            
 President Clinton signed was to "promote in the telephone and cable markets
            
 while easing regulations on cable prices and broadcast-station ownership."
            
 (Hendricks, 1999, 39) Congress thought legislation was needed to spur
            
 competition and investment in advanced telecommunications networks.
            
 However, President Clinton thought the original bill sent to him promote...