Much of what we now understand about war and tactics has been gleaned
            
 from centuries of history birthed in the Greco-Roman experience. Not only
            
 did Greek and Roman culture lead directly into later European theory by
            
 inspiring the tactical writers and thinkers of the Rennaissance and its
            
 history become a textbook case for latter strategical study, it also had a
            
 directly hands-on influence on the Western approach to war. It is hard to
            
 find a nation in Europe or Eurasia whose natives did not both train under
            
 the direct military guidance of Rome and gain further combat experience in
            
 turn fighting against Roman troops. The so-called barbarians of the Roman
            
 era, after all, were destined to become the predominate races of medieval
            
 and modern Europe, and the ideals of Imperial Rome inextricably bound up
            
 with the morality of the dominant European religious structure.  (King,
            
 2004;  Sazerac, 2002) So it should not be surprising that there is much to
            
 be learned from Greco-Roman tactical history, and much that may be applied
            
 to the modern world. In particular, parallels may be drawn between the
            
 constant warfare between the urban Greco-Roman world and the nomadic
            
 barbarian cultures that surrounded it, and the modern counter-insurgency
            
 and anti-terrorist "small wars" that engage the attention of the American
            
 super-power -- it seems entirely plausible that if one understood what
            
 aspect of the barbarian strategy dissassembled the powerful Greco-Roman
            
 civilization, one would be prepared to offer powerful advice regarding the
            
 tactics of modern American military movements.
            
       To truly understand the difference between the barbarian and the
            
 Roman strategies, one must  first understand that their tactics were rooted
            
 in different primary requirements for success. At the risk of making a
            
 sweeping generalization, it seems that Rome (like Greece or Egypt before
            
 it) was defined by its urban centers an...