n the United
States, Turks in Germany, North Africans in France and Spain, etc.).
(University of California, San Diego Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies
The most important question of the above work follows as the world and the
United States begin to reevaluate immigration, based on the new human
rights standards often ignored in the interest of "greater good."
Will governments opt to invest in the human capital that they are now
receiving from Third World countries (rather than simply bemoan these
foreign workers' initially low educational and occupational skill
levels 31 ) and facilitate their incorporation into labor-hungry
sectors of the economy, while protecting their labor and human rights'
(University of California, San Diego Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies
This work will first look at the historical nature of the U.S. limitation
on immigration over the ages and discuss the racist or at the very least
xenophobic attitudes of the historical immigration laws. Lastly this work
will look at some of the current laws and attempt to understand just how an
institution, or group of laws so clearly based on unethical and even
immoral standards can be such a large part of the governing issues in the
United States. The work will argue that immigration limitation, especially
as it exists today serves very little purpose and should be revamped yet
again to exclude the racism and xenophobia that runs rampant within the
Within one of the most extensive documentary histories of the subject
of U.S. Immigration laws there are countless examples of the exclusionary
policies of the United States. It seems that the most important issues for
those shaping law were associated with decreasing the chances that any one
group of foreign-born individuals could not reach status of anything
The annual quota of any nationality for the fiscal year be...