y of the pro-democracy drive. Many skeptics question budget constraints, Congressional will prior to the 2006 elections, and Bush's shaky domestic mandate (Peel, 2005). Questions about whether Bush foreign policy was just driven by a domestic U.S. political timeline also breed disbelief. Third, many people across the globe question the methods of the Bush freedom policy. This is why many Europeans shy away from the coercive means the Bush administration appears to favor (Peel, 2005).
             However, as time flies, the introduction of a democratic form of governance in the Middles East seemed a good idea. It should be noted that Bush has already called for the countries in the Middle East to change its autocratic government to a democratic one (Chicago Tribune, 2003), The people should then be allowed to choose possible candidates to lead the country and then vote which among them would best fit for the huge responsibility attached to being a leader of the nation. Thus, it is clear that what has been started
             ...