In A Jury of Our Fears, Judge Harold J. Rothwax argues convincingly that the 
            
 American jury system is plagued with several serious problems.  Chief among them, 
            
 compulsory jury service enforcement, the incomprehensible requirement in almost every 
            
 state and the federal court system for unanimous jury verdicts, despite not being required 
            
 by the Constitution; and the corruption of peremptory challenges in jury selection through 
            
 Rothwax explains that compulsory jury service is not a particularly effective 
            
 means of establishing jury pools, partly because the juror summons is largely unenforced 
            
 and partly because it relies on methods that ignore large segments of the population.  
            
 Since most jurisdictions rely on voting registration lists to establish their jury pools, it 
            
 automatically ignores most nonvoters, which may be a very substantial percentage in 
            
 The fact that compliance with juror summonses are almost entirely unenforced 
            
 means that many of the most intelligent and educated potential jurors eliminate 
            
 themselves from consideration by ignoring the summons, while a much higher 
            
 percentage of the less educated and politically savvy respond out of fear of the illusory 
            
 consequences of shirking their civic responsibility.  One of the solutions suggested by 
            
 Rothwax is to expand the pool of potential jurors by adding drivers license registration to 
            
 include many nonvoters.  Now, over a decade after Rothwax wrote the essay, the 
            
 integration of computers into society would make it even easier than the author 
            
 envisioned to implement that particular method of addressing this criticism.
            
 Rothwax points to the requirement in all but two of fifty states for unanimous jury 
            
 verdicts.  According to the author, requiring unanimity is a prescription for obtaining 
            
 verdicts by peer pressure and intimidation anytime a jury i
            
...